Apr. 2nd, 2020

nikpavl2002: (Default)
[Ru]
 
 
[Eng]
 
   Until recently, there has been only one source of knowledge on the planet – the one that is controlled by the “world government." People had ideas about the surrounding world, about the goals, tasks and the meaning of their existence, "scooping" knowledge scilicet from it. This allowed for 100% oversee of the "controlled majority". In the minds of people, stereotypes and a system of prohibitions were formed in order to please the “controlling minority”.
  It is logical to call this process "total zombieing." The behavior of each and every one was motivated and limited by certain social attitudes, introduced into the consciousness of human during his/her becoming and formation.
  All state and community institutions are motivated to form a model of social structure in accordance with the needs and “recommendations” of the “controlling minority.” In reality there was carried out testing and formation of the most “stable” model of the state, called the “democratic” one. In it, the ruling class (the bourgeoisie) is represented by two or three parties, which are nominated for the right to form the next government.
  Otherwise, everything remains unchanged. There is only being created an illusion of socio-political life, which is designed to convince the "controlled majority" of the existence of choice, and therefore, the hope for change in life for the better. For the sake of its more "realistic" perception, there was foreseen "polyvariaty" at the level of ethnic, religious and political preferences of modifications for the implementation of the said model. And there was happiness to all, for 'blessed is the one who is unaware'.
  Difficulties arose recently, with the advent of a new Source of knowledge, which in fact turned out to be more "capacious and advanced" than the System, and thereby revealed its real danger to the "situational" power of the "controlling minority." The reaction to its appearance can be considered an “uncontrolled flow” of information previously hushed up or denied.
  The meaning is simple. The overabundance of information "about new and unknown" was supposed to cause a defensive reaction of rejection in the minds of people, and this, in turn, should counter-balance the perception of information from a new source. According to the logic of the "managers" such a "trick" should have worked. But there could be a different kind of logic... In fact, everything happens outside the assumptions and wishes of the "controlling minority."
  The Source initiated the process of replacing basic information in the minds of the entire population of the Earth in real time smoothly and synchronously, which, obviously, was reflected in the motivation and development of many events, including the latest events in the Middle East. The confrontational component in the actions and motivations of the warring parties will be going away. The usual means of exerting pressure and inciting conflicts on the part of interested states have shown complete failure. So, the "players" of world politics have to reckon with the limitation of their capabilities and demonstrate in every possible way that nothing unusual is happening.
 
Translated by professor Leonid Bilousov 
nikpavl2002: (Default)
[Ru]
 
 
[Eng]
 
  Basic knowledge of a person should be fundamental. This is the foundation on which we build the picture of the world surrounding us as close as possible to reality.
  In fact, it is basic knowledge that is most often revised and cast doubt on its truth. It turns out that the process of cognition in its current form is reduced to an attempt to change basic knowledge that we gain in the process of becoming and forming is fragmentary, erroneous, incomplete, which, in turn, forms distorted ideas about the essence of the processes taking place in the world around us.
  But after all, this knowledge should be formed on the basis of the experience of cognition of previous generations and society as a whole! It should be so, but in reality this is not. The cause is simple: the basic knowledge is formed on the basis of subjective ideas of a group of people in the context of their plans and intentions in the exercise of power over the "controlled" majority, therefore it has nothing in common with the experience of society.
   The "managers" themselves acquire the "full-fledged" experience of society, and therefore have the most objective ideas about the universe. It is they who hold their ground in this world, and everyone else is destined to remain in a state of confusion, lack of assertion and doubt. Now the principle of "divide and rule" becomes clear.
  The community knowledge pyramid is turned upside down. Those who are above have the whole wealth of knowledge, and those who are below, are satisfied with a minimum. Essentially, these "managers" are the real rulers, in other words the 'world governmentю.' I dare to assure you that neither the presidents, nor the bankers, nor the super-rich people are in this government. The latter are also only participants in a virtual game, and therefore do not feel confident. Their wealth and power is a myth. They only obediently carry out the instructions of the “managers” and can be overthrown if they disobey the will of the “world government”. So in reality, the construction of a hierarchy of power "on a world chessboard" and all the battles on it take place according to the will of these "celestial beings."
  There is one interesting property in people – uniting into communities, they automatically form a social experience, which is summarized from the personal experience of each. As a result, people get more complete and correct ideas about the essence of what is happening, which may lead them to destroy the "virtual world" imposed on them by "managers." Hence the understanding of the reason why the government is afraid of and in every possible way seeks to prevent emergence of such associations of people...
   The science "for people" is just an imitation and an institution "for schmoozing" and disorientating of the inquisitive and curious ones. Reasonable activity of people in the "virtual world" is harmful, and therefore not welcome. Emotional evaluations as a form of self-expression are dominant. It is interesting to observe how people argue, proving the priority of personal error. Everything is permeated with lies and mistrust. In the "virtual world" competition is being implanted, which is akin to the struggle for survival, and is designed to resist the attempts of sane people to unite. This is the world in which we live.
  But in parallel there is another world – world of nature, a part of which we feel ourselves. There is harmony, expediency and hope. For many, this is a way out of "virtual psychosis." People are tired of the "theater of the absurd", in which each is against everyone and everyone is for him/herself. The nature of human is the desire for cooperation, as the basis for building society. Person wants to trust and not be deceived, and seeks his/her usefulness in the life of his/her own kind. Destruction is disgusting to him/her, because the need for creation lives in him/her. People are not born bad, but become such. So not everything is lost, and there is a chance for return to normal life.
 
Translated by professor Leonid Bilousov 

Profile

nikpavl2002: (Default)
nikpavl2002

September 2024

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22 232425262728
2930     

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 7th, 2025 05:57 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios