![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
[Ru]
nikpavl2002.dreamwidth.org/868.html
[Eng]
Multiple people believe that a person chooses, when s/he sees, hears, feels, but it is far from being so. All channels of communication between a person and the outside world work to the maximum, giving consciousness the maximum possible amount of information and our consciousness recreates from it a ‘copy’ of the surrounding being, within which framework an informed choice is made. Hereof it follows that a ‘copy’ of a being within consciousness should correspond as precisely as possible to the ‘original’ of the reality outside of a human. Reliability and adequacy make it possible to take the right decisions.
It is scilicet the ability of consciousness to create and work with a ‘copy’ of the surrounding world inside a human brain allows s/he to cognize the laws of Being. True, this subtle instrument requires correct treatment. Otherwise, a person, at best, can get a lot of problems.
Let us take, for example, a colorblind person. His/her vision gives a color picture of the world, which differs from the normal one that does not cause any special discomfort, for such a vision is unique (as far as there is no other), and therefore is perceived as a given. The discrepancy can be revealed only in the process of exchanging information about what has been seen with other people, but the question of the norm is solved on the principle of the majority. The minority is forced to take the majority's vision on trust.
It turns out that the so-called ‘free’ memory of a human is not at all free, but is involved in the formation of a dynamic ‘copy’ of the surrounding world. Adequacy of a perception forms the right reactions, which contributes to the survival of a human being in the environment.
Now a human is forced to abide in two environments: the physical one (the world that is surrounding him/her) and the social one (after all, s/he is part of a large social organism called the society).
Logically, society is seen as a form of survival of the human species in the surrounding world. In the current situation, the issue of survival in the environment has receded far into the background.
The System simulates a virtual environment of ‘survival’ within the society, forcing each member to ‘compete’ for ‘a place in the sun.’ Manipulating the initial (basic) information, one can vary and create in the consciousness of each society’s member a certain general projection of the universe, as well as the goals and ways of achieving them within the framework of this projection.
Thus, it is possible to induce all members of the society to pass through this or that level of the virtual ‘game’ up to a full reset, with the subsequent exit to the ‘zero’ level. Apocalypse within the framework of such a ‘game’ can be considered as an inscription: 'Game over' on a computer monitor.
Apr. 12th, 2011
Translated by professor Leonid Bilousov
nikpavl2002.dreamwidth.org/868.html
[Eng]
Multiple people believe that a person chooses, when s/he sees, hears, feels, but it is far from being so. All channels of communication between a person and the outside world work to the maximum, giving consciousness the maximum possible amount of information and our consciousness recreates from it a ‘copy’ of the surrounding being, within which framework an informed choice is made. Hereof it follows that a ‘copy’ of a being within consciousness should correspond as precisely as possible to the ‘original’ of the reality outside of a human. Reliability and adequacy make it possible to take the right decisions.
It is scilicet the ability of consciousness to create and work with a ‘copy’ of the surrounding world inside a human brain allows s/he to cognize the laws of Being. True, this subtle instrument requires correct treatment. Otherwise, a person, at best, can get a lot of problems.
Let us take, for example, a colorblind person. His/her vision gives a color picture of the world, which differs from the normal one that does not cause any special discomfort, for such a vision is unique (as far as there is no other), and therefore is perceived as a given. The discrepancy can be revealed only in the process of exchanging information about what has been seen with other people, but the question of the norm is solved on the principle of the majority. The minority is forced to take the majority's vision on trust.
It turns out that the so-called ‘free’ memory of a human is not at all free, but is involved in the formation of a dynamic ‘copy’ of the surrounding world. Adequacy of a perception forms the right reactions, which contributes to the survival of a human being in the environment.
Now a human is forced to abide in two environments: the physical one (the world that is surrounding him/her) and the social one (after all, s/he is part of a large social organism called the society).
Logically, society is seen as a form of survival of the human species in the surrounding world. In the current situation, the issue of survival in the environment has receded far into the background.
The System simulates a virtual environment of ‘survival’ within the society, forcing each member to ‘compete’ for ‘a place in the sun.’ Manipulating the initial (basic) information, one can vary and create in the consciousness of each society’s member a certain general projection of the universe, as well as the goals and ways of achieving them within the framework of this projection.
Thus, it is possible to induce all members of the society to pass through this or that level of the virtual ‘game’ up to a full reset, with the subsequent exit to the ‘zero’ level. Apocalypse within the framework of such a ‘game’ can be considered as an inscription: 'Game over' on a computer monitor.
A Little About a Lot of Things
Apr. 12th, 2011
Once the disciples asked Christ: “Teacher, why don’t you communicate with other people as you do with us?” To which Christ replied: “And you look at them. They came to see and do not see, and others came to hear and do not hear!”
Communication is a two-way street. Is it possible to call ‘communication’ a process, when people speak, but hear only themselves? Quite the Babel, isn’t it? The dispute has long been not accompanying the search for Truth, and turned into war of words. Since the time of Christ, society has degraded spiritually and is now akin to a herd, disconnected in the absence of the Shepherd. And in this herd there reign sedition and chaos.
Others ‘of the equal ones’, professing the cult of Power, subdued the weaker and began to divide, not by right, the riches of this world, which does not belong to them. And how long can they commit violence, condemning to poverty, illness and death those who are just like them, who were also “created in the image and likeness?” The answer is obvious: only the Coming of the Shepherd will pacify the ‘lost herd’. But this, perhaps, is not news. The news is that He is already here.
The powers that be, until recently, naively believed that they could join the ‘dialogue of equals’ with the Shepherd. Being not equal with each other, they are equal with everyone, because, like the majority of people, in essence they are also ‘sheep’. And the Shepherd does not have a word for them, except for the Force, whom they are used to obey. And it would be worth remembering that the Creator is the Witness of lawlessness, committed by them in this world. So they will have to consume the whole measure of evil, which they created by their actions. You were waiting for the justice of Heaven, so it is already going on. And ‘the brave rulers of human destinies’ really have something to be afraid of. Yes, gentlemen, your guesses are correct. You already had an opportunity to see in the Middle East how the Shepherd controlled the ‘herd’s’ movement. This was how He began ‘cleaning’ in His House.
Communication is a two-way street. Is it possible to call ‘communication’ a process, when people speak, but hear only themselves? Quite the Babel, isn’t it? The dispute has long been not accompanying the search for Truth, and turned into war of words. Since the time of Christ, society has degraded spiritually and is now akin to a herd, disconnected in the absence of the Shepherd. And in this herd there reign sedition and chaos.
Others ‘of the equal ones’, professing the cult of Power, subdued the weaker and began to divide, not by right, the riches of this world, which does not belong to them. And how long can they commit violence, condemning to poverty, illness and death those who are just like them, who were also “created in the image and likeness?” The answer is obvious: only the Coming of the Shepherd will pacify the ‘lost herd’. But this, perhaps, is not news. The news is that He is already here.
The powers that be, until recently, naively believed that they could join the ‘dialogue of equals’ with the Shepherd. Being not equal with each other, they are equal with everyone, because, like the majority of people, in essence they are also ‘sheep’. And the Shepherd does not have a word for them, except for the Force, whom they are used to obey. And it would be worth remembering that the Creator is the Witness of lawlessness, committed by them in this world. So they will have to consume the whole measure of evil, which they created by their actions. You were waiting for the justice of Heaven, so it is already going on. And ‘the brave rulers of human destinies’ really have something to be afraid of. Yes, gentlemen, your guesses are correct. You already had an opportunity to see in the Middle East how the Shepherd controlled the ‘herd’s’ movement. This was how He began ‘cleaning’ in His House.
Translated by professor Leonid Bilousov