«User's Guide - 2»
Jul. 6th, 2016 09:31 am[Ru]
nikpavl2002.dreamwidth.org/37137.html
[Eng]
On the origins of the phenomenon of the Ukrainian volunteers' and soldiers' invincibility.
It just so happened that my ideas about the world do not fit into the framework of the general ideas that are inherent to the vast majority of people. What is obvious to me, is not so for the others, and vice versa. People are living in the world which is unknown to them, but only a few are aware of this fact. The consciousness of the majority of people is set to recognize the familiar images and processes, and everything that does not fit into the routine's framework, they deny and reject. Thus personal experience of the individual enters into a conflict with the «social experience», which he or she received in the process of learning from the society as a system of knowledge and ideas about the world. Nonsense.
In a healthy society, the «social experience» is formed of a plurality of the individual experiences of people who compose that society, and therefore it cannot enter in conflict with them. In our case, the controlling minority usurped the right to dispose the social experience of society and on the basis of the monopolized access to it formed an own power vertical. Those at the top of the pyramid know everything, and those who are at its bottom – only what is needed for their survival and ensuring their absolute obedience to the «superiors'» interests.
Social being is primary in relation to the consciousness of a man, so the fact of what is happening is important, rather than the people's consciousness' interpretation of it.
It is foolish to argue with a man who has a system of values and beliefs about the world which is very different from the one that is inherent to you. That human a priori does not intend to have a constructive dialogue with you and sincerely considers him- or herself to be the bearer of the true knowledge. Any arguments of the objective nature are denied without any analysis in accordance with the principle that this can not be because this can never be. It is true that life sometimes brings about changes, and a man himself faces with a really intractable problem of the being: there is nothing that convinces one better on the reality of what is going on, than that what happens to the one personally. Those who addressed to me for the relief, and got it, know that everything that happened to them the other people can hardly accept on faith, since in their life anything like this has not previously occurred. Those who received the relief are satisfied with the result, but cannot find the explanation of how it was achieved. Sometimes person's wisdom lies in the simplicity of his or her actions. The one, who comes to the spring, in order to quench his thirst, decides personally whether to drink or not to drink water from it.
Only the one, who had already consumed the water from the spring can determine its real usefulness. For those who had no chance to do it, there are two possibilities to ensure themselves in its medicinal properties. The first is to believe someone who has drunk from the spring, and the second – to drink from it himself. There are also those, who, having come to the spring, choose to die of thirst beside it, doubting in its purity. It is always a personal choice of the individual.
When I was writing my address to the ATO participants [nikpavl2002.dreamwidth.org/32756.html], I've been conscious of the possibility that in the framework of traditional ideas about the world, many from among the «normal» people, who would read it, would include this «opus» among the category of the «city madman's» fantasies. And only those, whom their life has put in front of a difficult choice, will see in it a real chance to solve their problems. It is just like in life: a full man is no friend to a hungry man.
For most people, the concept of God, that is the Creator, is associated with religious beliefs, that is why they «know» exactly when and how He «should participate» in their lives. However, there is a nuance, which people always forget: God has never been associated with the sphere of services for a human. Nobody should enter someone's house and behave as he or she pleases. It was said: seek and you shall find; knock and it shall be opened unto you; ask, and it shall be given you. The Creator gave a human the life and the right to choose, and simultaneously imposed upon him responsibility for the choice. So, the irresponsible acts do not exist. The people's right for choice became possible due to self-restriction of the Creator, Who forbade Himself to interfere in their lives. This does not mean that on His part He had left the people unsupervised. A person can pick an own way, but the God is able to turn the route on which he or she will go.
«Unreality» of the Creator's existence for many stems from the inefficiency of addressing to Him in the form of a prayer. Oddly enough, but the problem arose after the death of the Apostle Peter. Scilicet he was given the right to name people before God, and, doing so, give each the opportunity to be recognized by Him. Peter hadn't handed this right to anyone. Since then, the christening of a human has lost its true content, similar to the way how the baby was splashed out of the font with the water.
I have neither the desire, nor the need to prove something to the people. I give everyone the opportunity to come to the Spring, and all the rest belongs to the sphere of the problems and the responsibility of every individual. At the time, Jesus said to the people: "I will come unexpectedly, and everyone should be ready." He spoke about the people's preparedness to meet with the Creator. Each will be rewarded the measure of good and evil, which he or she brought into the world in the process of making choices. However, the Creator 's concept of the sin is very different from its religious interpretations and more close to such a legal concept as the «crime».Thus, in His understanding there aren't that many «sinful» among the people, and the common human doesn't need be afraid of the Devine Justice.
And a little bit about how to ask the Creator for the relief. Do not ask for a man if you do not know him or her. It is better, when a supplicant personally addresses to the Creator, and if for some reason he or she cannot do this (for example, due to stay in a coma), then those who are close to that person can ask for him or her and thus help to overcome the burdens of disease. It is a responsible action on the part of the petitioner. The people are used to address to God when they are not able to cope with the problems, which they often create themselves. It is much more effective to seek relief from the Creator at the stage of the choice-making. That is why our soldiers and commanders have every reason to ask God for relief and protection twenty-four hours a day, at any time before each fight. In this case, they will no longer need to address for treatment due to the injury. It is better to prevent disaster than to eliminate its consequences. One should ask for protection from death and injury before each fight, and not just once a week or a day, as so many do.
The same applies to the wounded soldiers. Today He «pulled» you out of the coma, but if you do not persevere in asking Him continuously for full recovery, it will only complicate the healing process. Remember: the rescue of drowning is the handiwork of drowning. God bless you!
Translated by professor Leonid Bilousov
nikpavl2002.dreamwidth.org/37137.html
[Eng]
On the origins of the phenomenon of the Ukrainian volunteers' and soldiers' invincibility.
It just so happened that my ideas about the world do not fit into the framework of the general ideas that are inherent to the vast majority of people. What is obvious to me, is not so for the others, and vice versa. People are living in the world which is unknown to them, but only a few are aware of this fact. The consciousness of the majority of people is set to recognize the familiar images and processes, and everything that does not fit into the routine's framework, they deny and reject. Thus personal experience of the individual enters into a conflict with the «social experience», which he or she received in the process of learning from the society as a system of knowledge and ideas about the world. Nonsense.
In a healthy society, the «social experience» is formed of a plurality of the individual experiences of people who compose that society, and therefore it cannot enter in conflict with them. In our case, the controlling minority usurped the right to dispose the social experience of society and on the basis of the monopolized access to it formed an own power vertical. Those at the top of the pyramid know everything, and those who are at its bottom – only what is needed for their survival and ensuring their absolute obedience to the «superiors'» interests.
Social being is primary in relation to the consciousness of a man, so the fact of what is happening is important, rather than the people's consciousness' interpretation of it.
It is foolish to argue with a man who has a system of values and beliefs about the world which is very different from the one that is inherent to you. That human a priori does not intend to have a constructive dialogue with you and sincerely considers him- or herself to be the bearer of the true knowledge. Any arguments of the objective nature are denied without any analysis in accordance with the principle that this can not be because this can never be. It is true that life sometimes brings about changes, and a man himself faces with a really intractable problem of the being: there is nothing that convinces one better on the reality of what is going on, than that what happens to the one personally. Those who addressed to me for the relief, and got it, know that everything that happened to them the other people can hardly accept on faith, since in their life anything like this has not previously occurred. Those who received the relief are satisfied with the result, but cannot find the explanation of how it was achieved. Sometimes person's wisdom lies in the simplicity of his or her actions. The one, who comes to the spring, in order to quench his thirst, decides personally whether to drink or not to drink water from it.
Only the one, who had already consumed the water from the spring can determine its real usefulness. For those who had no chance to do it, there are two possibilities to ensure themselves in its medicinal properties. The first is to believe someone who has drunk from the spring, and the second – to drink from it himself. There are also those, who, having come to the spring, choose to die of thirst beside it, doubting in its purity. It is always a personal choice of the individual.
When I was writing my address to the ATO participants [nikpavl2002.dreamwidth.org/32756.html], I've been conscious of the possibility that in the framework of traditional ideas about the world, many from among the «normal» people, who would read it, would include this «opus» among the category of the «city madman's» fantasies. And only those, whom their life has put in front of a difficult choice, will see in it a real chance to solve their problems. It is just like in life: a full man is no friend to a hungry man.
For most people, the concept of God, that is the Creator, is associated with religious beliefs, that is why they «know» exactly when and how He «should participate» in their lives. However, there is a nuance, which people always forget: God has never been associated with the sphere of services for a human. Nobody should enter someone's house and behave as he or she pleases. It was said: seek and you shall find; knock and it shall be opened unto you; ask, and it shall be given you. The Creator gave a human the life and the right to choose, and simultaneously imposed upon him responsibility for the choice. So, the irresponsible acts do not exist. The people's right for choice became possible due to self-restriction of the Creator, Who forbade Himself to interfere in their lives. This does not mean that on His part He had left the people unsupervised. A person can pick an own way, but the God is able to turn the route on which he or she will go.
«Unreality» of the Creator's existence for many stems from the inefficiency of addressing to Him in the form of a prayer. Oddly enough, but the problem arose after the death of the Apostle Peter. Scilicet he was given the right to name people before God, and, doing so, give each the opportunity to be recognized by Him. Peter hadn't handed this right to anyone. Since then, the christening of a human has lost its true content, similar to the way how the baby was splashed out of the font with the water.
I have neither the desire, nor the need to prove something to the people. I give everyone the opportunity to come to the Spring, and all the rest belongs to the sphere of the problems and the responsibility of every individual. At the time, Jesus said to the people: "I will come unexpectedly, and everyone should be ready." He spoke about the people's preparedness to meet with the Creator. Each will be rewarded the measure of good and evil, which he or she brought into the world in the process of making choices. However, the Creator 's concept of the sin is very different from its religious interpretations and more close to such a legal concept as the «crime».Thus, in His understanding there aren't that many «sinful» among the people, and the common human doesn't need be afraid of the Devine Justice.
And a little bit about how to ask the Creator for the relief. Do not ask for a man if you do not know him or her. It is better, when a supplicant personally addresses to the Creator, and if for some reason he or she cannot do this (for example, due to stay in a coma), then those who are close to that person can ask for him or her and thus help to overcome the burdens of disease. It is a responsible action on the part of the petitioner. The people are used to address to God when they are not able to cope with the problems, which they often create themselves. It is much more effective to seek relief from the Creator at the stage of the choice-making. That is why our soldiers and commanders have every reason to ask God for relief and protection twenty-four hours a day, at any time before each fight. In this case, they will no longer need to address for treatment due to the injury. It is better to prevent disaster than to eliminate its consequences. One should ask for protection from death and injury before each fight, and not just once a week or a day, as so many do.
The same applies to the wounded soldiers. Today He «pulled» you out of the coma, but if you do not persevere in asking Him continuously for full recovery, it will only complicate the healing process. Remember: the rescue of drowning is the handiwork of drowning. God bless you!
Translated by professor Leonid Bilousov