On the Impossibly Possible (06.06.2013)

[Ru]

 

nikpavl2002.dreamwidth.org/16143.html

 

[Eng]

 

At the dawn of civilization, only strong and hardy people could dominate among their fellow tribesmen. With the advent of cold arms, it became obvious that the advantage in physical strength only was no longer enough to win. Superiority was on the side of those who skillfully wielded it. The invention of firearms completely equalized the chances for winning in duels between physically weak and strong people.

At the same time, there has always been a secret knowledge that made it possible to influence the enemy in a non-contact way. In the system of ancient martial arts, there were methods for the development of such abilities. In particular, in Ukraine the legendary Cossacks-kharaterniks had excelled in them.* After the collapse of the USSR, films appeared in which specialists demonstrated their ability to hit the enemy in a non-contact way.

Extrasensory "force" influence is also present in the arsenal of many special services, as well as remote scanning of objects with the help of sleepers (clairvoyants). Only a few people possess such abilities, and the degree of effectiveness of their use is different.

It should be noted that a person cannot have both clairvoyance and the ability to exert force. This is comparable to the fact that we will try to use a supersensitive receiver next to a very powerful transmitter, which will definitely disable it.

In any case, each of these types of control is external in relation to the object to which it is directed. A person exposed to such an influence will be either "suppressed" and forced into obedience, or even completely zombified. In this case, the body defines the impact directed at it as external violence, and will, if possible, try to resist it.

It is not difficult to recognize that a person is under a "force" influence, since the latter changes his/her behavior and state as a whole. This kind of reaction on the part of the object does not allow to control him/her imperceptibly, which is not very satisfactory for the intelligence officers who need a "subtle" influence on a person's motivation, so that no one doubts that he/she is acting of his/her own free will. The search in this direction continues, but the results are not yet encouraging.

Is it possible, influencing a person, imperceptibly for him or her  to change the motivation of his/her actions?

No, if one uses the means and methods of this world, because his/her consciousness will be able to recognize the impact through a change in the state of the organism, and the person will try to resist it. But by means of the Creator's world it is possible. This type of influence is carried out, as it were, from within a person, and not from the outside.

Imagine that the examinee chooses one of three identical objects. The images of all of them are in his/her memory, and consciousness chooses the desired object of three ones having designated it in a special way. If you enter the memory of a person imperceptibly for him- or herself and "rearrange the mark" from the chosen object to another, then he/she will consider it his/her own choice.

In so doing it is possible to change the motivation of any of us, and we will be sure that this is our own choice.

If I can do this with any of you, then it would be foolish for me to try to prove to people that this is possible, because their confidence in the impossibility of such an action is beneficial for the one who exerts the influence. It is worth noting that "forceful influence" is not a natural property of a person, and he/she is not free to dispose of it at his/her own discretion. In reality, his/her consciousness is only a "conductor" of the force of Evil (sort of  like a channel for its penetration into our world), and therefore the motivation for applying and choosing a goal is the prerogative of the Force itself.

Let's take a simple example: the head of an enterprise must choose one of several applicants for a vacant position. Their personal files are on the table in front of him/her, and he/she will probably choose the most "worthy" one. In reality, the selection process is only an imitation, and the vacant position will be granted the one who "brought in" the most money, but the form of the procedure will be respected.

If I enter the memory of the leader and motivate him/her to choose the person I need, then he/she will do it and will believe in the sanctity that he/she chose him/herself.

In the memory of a person, in addition to facts, events, actions, there are also associative connections that form ideas about the world around him/her. If you change in a proper way the associative connections in the memory of a group of people, then you can form a commonality of views, worldview and motivations for their actions. At just the right moment, these people can consciously and in an organized manner begin to synchronously perform special actions to achieve a certain common goal. At the same time, the common center for controlling the movement of masses, familiar to people, will not exist at all. Something similar was noted by political scientists and military analysts during the events of the "Arab Spring", in particular on Mīdān at-Taḥrīr (Tahrir Square) in Cairo.

The current "inertia" of the population in Ukraine is only an intermediate phase before the start of organized actions to restore the legitimate authority. This will be a conscious movement of large masses of people, and each person will begin to perform a specific sequence of actions. At the same time, it is not worth looking for a single center for controlling the organized movement of the masses, since it simply does not exist.

The Translator's notes

* For details see:   https://ukrmir.info/en/ivan-sirko-velikiy-voin-harakternik/

 

Translated by professor Leonid Bilousov

 

On the Possibilities of Reforming Society (26.08.2013)

 [Ru]

 

nikpavl2002.dreamwidth.org/17624.html

 

[Eng]

 

Being a social creature, a person can gain knowledge about the world around him/her in the process of his/her formation and learning. It is logical to assume that this will be the knowledge and experience of society, which is the quintessence of the knowledge and experience of all previous generations.

Alas, this is not the case. The level of understanding of the world and the amount of knowledge will depend on the person’s place in the “hierarchical ladder of the power”. All "revolutionary" ideas "trickle down" from above, and the controlled majority perceives them as "revelations," naively believing that their implementation will change the existence of society for the better.

What is the difference between a person belonging to the caste of managers and a hard worker who is mired in poverty on the brink of survival? Knowledge! But do not rush to think that, having gained access to knowledge, the worker will be able to replace the manager.

Significant differences in the system of basic knowledge and ideas of the worker and the manager will not allow the former to perceive what is given for the latter. Knowledge will come into conflict with the worldview, as well as the ideas of the worker, and will simply be rejected by his/her consciousness.

To prevent this from happening, it is necessary to change the basic knowledge and ideas, convincing the learner of their incompleteness or unreliability. Learning is always easier than retraining. Retraining is the worst option, because there is a process of replacing knowledge, and not perceiving it "from scratch".

This substitution is conditional and most often fragmentary, because new knowledge can be perceived only at the evidentiary level. Hence, in the minds of people there will be doubts about the truth of the newly acquired knowledge and uncertainty in their application.

Most people do not even suspect how powerful as means of civilizational change the process of teaching subsequent generations can be. 

There is always a problem of freedom of access to knowledge itself and its reliability. Usually, it can only be obtained from "renegades" from the power class. Therefore, not every revolution can lead to constructive changes in society. Most often, the changes concern the personalities in power, and not its essence.

Ask the "newly minted revolutionaries" from the opposition about their vision of the country's near future after they take power. You will not hear anything definite, except for general phrases and slogans.

Their goal is to gain power and nothing more, which makes them only personified, and not a qualitative replacement for their predecessors. Probably, they will be a lesser evil than the "former" ones, which, however, is also not a fact. The very institution of power for them is sacred and inviolable.

A certain V.F. Khalipov, in the past a faithful Marxist-Leninist, the founder of kratology, the science of power, pompously declares that power is a true find and a true apex of a person, a regulator of relations with his/her own kind, given to him/her by life itself ... People should put power in the very first place in all the diversity of its forms and manifestations, and above all, state power.

The Creator has His own view of the future – in the prospect, power as a social institution should be eliminated everywhere, replaced by popular self-government.

The country has been living for more than twenty years in anticipation of reforms and changes for the better. The reason for this "stagnation" lies in the lack of elementary knowledge and understanding of the essence and principles of state building in the minds of the newly-minted "managers." They are mediocre, ignorant and pathological liars, and therefore are busy with their usual business – theft. There is no greater trouble for the state than an abuzz “fool in power.”

Any "party-building" in the post-Soviet space results in the emergence of another clone of the CPSU. State administration bodies are a poor copy of analogous bodies of the USSR. And this despite the fact that the form of ownership has changed and socialism has given way to capitalism, and the state is no longer the owner and is forced to live off taxes. Officials still want to manage everything and everyone, and therefore they are busy inventing all kinds of corruption schemes. The Law gave way to the “unwritten (criminal) rules" and "total lawlessness." 

It's time for the authorities to stop looking for some special national ways of development, but to call on intelligent specialists and take advantage of the experience of state building of the same European countries. Bourgeois society, the construction of which the authorities are "concerned with," has long and successfully functioned in developed countries.

At the moment, in Ukraine, the so-called "middle" class has turned out to be most interested in carrying out reforms. It is its "strangulation" that the current government is busy with. Representatives of this class should form a representative body, which would act as a customer in the formation of government bodies. Its competence should include issues of expediency, number and funds allocated for the maintenance of the government, ministries and departments. Managers for vacant positions must be hired on a competitive basis. Similarly, it is necessary to reform the judicial and legislative branches of government. A lustration process is also required. This is one of the possible scenarios for the transformation of society.

A big problem in matters of reforming society is the disunity of people and the difficulties in achieving mutual understanding. There are two options for solving this problem, and both of them are beyond the competence of people.

The first one we could observe during the events of the "Arab Spring". This is control at the subconscious level, when the motivation for action comes to people from the outside. Motivation is individual for everyone, which allows the managed to carry out his/her specific task.

The second option does not exclude the first and consists in the formation of associative connections in the memory of a person that would allow him/her to acquire the most reliable system of knowledge and ideas about the world around him/her.

This means that all people will receive the same basic knowledge and ideas, and with them a new system of values, which would be the first step towards restoring mutual understanding and trust between them. The second option will give people an understanding of what and how everyone should do, so that humanity regains the qualities of a social medium and with them – the perspective and goal of its further development.

 

Translated by professor Leonid Bilousov