About the Aberrants May (О заблуждающихся) 18th, 2011

 [Ru]

 
nikpavl2002.dreamwidth.org/1689.html

 

[Eng]

 

  If a person is fallible, then this is his/her problem. It is much worse when a fallacy shapes the views of many thousand people. This is fraught with much bigger problems.

  A misconception is most often linked to the lack of information about the essence of what is happening or with the fact that it is fragmented, distorted. Such a wrong belief can be corrected if a person is ready to admit the fallacy of his/her views on the essence of the problem, because of the availability of new information that substantially supplements or refutes the information that is already at his/her disposal. This state of affairs is quite normal in the process of cognition. 

  Quite often there are situations when a person (leader) deliberately misleads people who trust and follow him/her. Doing so,  s/he manipulates their consciousness, subjugating them to him/herself and provoking them to commit inadequate and most often aggressive acts. 

   As you know, the goal does not justify the choice of means to achieve it. In this case, actions of this kind can be classified as criminal, having a deliberate nature ... There are no such irresponsible acts that could go unpunished.

  You should not assume that people who 'broke through' into power are prone to misconceptions. It is 'natural selection' that did 'temper' them and they are ready 'for anything' to achieve their goals. And the power is their goal. Scilicet this is the 'power' that we have now.

  Recently, 'new' pretenders to power have appeared, blaspheming and scolding the current ones, and so boldly and loudly that it gives the average man creeps. Young, cynical and evil. And most importantly, they have it way too easy: came, saw, won! True, they modestly keep silent about how they are ready to dispose of this very power in case of its acquisition. 

  In fact, this is the same crass incompetence, clothed in outright lies. The common people are again offered to be on the horns of a dilemma. It turns out that the 'new' call you to fight the System of power by the means and methods that it offers. But this is nonsense! 

  A legitimate question arises: who benefits from this? The trick is that the 'new' thus helps the current authorities to identify all the 'dissenters' in order to properly 'sort it out' with them as soon as possible ... That's the whole System, its essence.

  This is not only about those who regularly read my articles, but also about people who respond to the calls of the 'new', or simply openly express dissatisfaction with the authorities on the networks. This does not mean that you should immediately get out of the display of your computer and hole up. It is always important to know the truth. Remember that on the pages of my journal you get the only reliable information about what is happening from the pure Quarry (i.e. the source of knowledge).

  Well, for those who, like you, have already 'lit up', in particular, those who have responded to the fake calls of the 'new', Big Brother will come anyway, because the Internet and all social networks are faithfully 'monitored' by the competent authorities ... It is not in vain that they say: be afraid Danians bringing gifts. It is also true that the road to hell is paved with 'good' intentions. Behind the 'new' technologies of the 'post-industrial' society, there could be seen the same struggle for power, and prohibit God to let the miffed and fools,  especially offended fools into it. 

 

Translated by professor Leonid Bilousov

Deja Vue (Дежавю) May. 31st, 2011

 [Ru]

 

nikpavl2002.dreamwidth.org/1972.html

 

[Eng]

 

  People are divided, and this is a fact. There is no doubt that many of us feel the need for communication, but we just don’t know how to communicate and, it seems, we don’t suffer much from it. In our consciousness, we are represented by our individuality and do not feel like part of a large social organism.

  What we have gained, and what we have lost while being in this condition? We have been made individualists by the type of small autonomous systems, but only at the level of personal perception. Physically, the System binds us to itself and makes us dependent. Any experience of independent and isolated existence of an individual outside the framework of the community is considered vicious, and therefore is hushed up and denied. 

  In a 'healthy' social medium, the information is reliable and complements, as a given, the personal experience of each of its members. The social experience is being formed as a set of personal experiences of each member of the social medium. Thus, the process of cognition of the world is accelerated over and over again. Communication in such a social medium is the need of everyone, for it performs the function of two-way transmission of information. No one would even think of distorting information during the exchange process. In fact, the reliability of public experience is repeatedly confirmed by each person’s individual experience. The social medium exists as a single organism. Contradictions between the individual experience of a person and the social experience of social medium a priori are not possible.

   What does each of us note for him/herself ipso facto of the existence in the current semblance of a social medium called a community? The first and obvious contradiction is noted between the personal experience of each and the totality of information (knowledge) that we receive from the community in the process of its coming and formation. We are being convinced of its truth, but each day of existence forms a personal experience, which, even with its narrow focus, contradicts, and often simply refutes, the public experience provided to us.

  In fact, we are simply condemned to an aimless existence, because our individual experience does not become the property of the majority and we do not function as a social medium, which means that we are forced to repeatedly obtain the same knowledge, which in itself likens our life to a stay in the 'squirrel wheel'.

  In addition to everything, the community professes the principle of competitive survival for each of its members, as opposed to cooperation and mutual assistance, which are the basis for the formation of a 'healthy' social medium.

  What progress can be talked about in this case? We are degrading as parts of a once healthy social organism. Our individual existence does not bear tangible social benefits, and therefore in the community, we can always be neglected. 

  The concept of a community is the invention of a small group of people who model a virtual social environment at the level of a primitive, repeating it through the formation of major basic knowledge about the surrounding world for each new generation. Thus, each generation repeats the program of the previous one. At the same time, the experience of the previous generation becomes unclaimed, since it does not go beyond the framework of the primitive, which means it does not carry anything new in itself. There is direct evidence of deja vue, but a person will wake up to this fact only at the end of his life cycle .

 

Translated by professor Leonid Bilousov